Note
Redid badge evaluation.
10.40-10.44: Revisit evaluation
Revisited and revised the badge criteria to (a) make them up-to-date, and (b) make sure they are specific to the descriptions from each badge. Hence, redoing evaluations for all eight studies.
Notes:
- Docs1 (“Documents (a) how code is used (b) how it relates to article (c) software, systems, packages and versions”) - No - although it has links to articles, it doesn’t link to specific outputs in article, or explain (a) or (c)
- Careful: Yes - it is well organised by norms/standards, and supported by documentation explaining organisation, which would help facilitate reuse
- Reproduce: No - as required extensive troubleshooting (i.e. writing code for scenarios and to make figures and so on) and large time commitment
- Readme: No - as doesn’t have step-by-step instructions for running model, just directory overview
Untimed: Update summary report
With new badge evaluation results.