Summary report

For computational reproducibility assessment of Author et al. Year

Please note: This is a template page and has not yet been completed

Study

[Authors]. [Title]. [Journal] [Volume], [Edition] ([Year]). <[URL]>.

[Paragraph summarising model]

Computational reproducibility

Successfully reproduced X out of X (X%) of items from the scope in Xh Xm (X%).

Required troubleshooting:

[List of required changes to code]

[One sentence description of item X]

[Display side-by-side]

[Set-up as for Item X]

Evaluation against guidelines

^{Context: The original study repository was evaluated against criteria from journal badges relating to how open and reproducible the model is and against guidance for sharing artefacts from the STARS framework. The original study article and supplementary materials (excluding code) were evaluated against reporting guidelines for DES models: STRESS-DES, and guidelines adapted from ISPOR-SDM.}