Note
Test-run of reproduction package, informing author/s and archiving repository.
Untimed: Test-run of reproduction package
Tom did a test-run on XPS13 with Ubuntu 22.04:
- Environment creation - confirm works as expected
- Pytest - completed successfully
- Reproduction.ipynb - reproduces charts
- Dockerfile - container built successfully
- Docker container - launched successfully and ran reproduction.ipynb
Untimed: Checking “unmet” criteria in evaluation
Tom also looked over the unmet criteria. Agreed in all cases. For reporting guidelines, he noted:
“The one that I thought about the most was”assumptions”. I re-read the CHARM section of the paper and my view is that I wasn’t clear on what were assumptions due to lack of knowledge/data and what wasn’t. I suspect using something like the Triangular distribution was an assumption as they had limited data, but its not stated explicitly. I guess that’s an issue with the limited space in a conference paper more than anything. So I agree with your not met.”
Untimed: Wrap-up
This marks the reproduction as complete, so we are able to:
- Inform the author/s
- Archive another version of the repository